The Uc Campus Funding Imbalance

Two years ago, the UC arrangement changed the means it distributes position down funds in addition to tuition revenue to the campuses.  In the past, all tuition dollars in addition to position down dollars were sent to the Office of the President in addition to redistributed according to unknown formulas.  After a position down audit showed that some campuses were beingness wound past times this process, the UC decided to permit the campuses proceed their ain tuition dollars, in addition to position down dollars were redistributed through a method called “rebenching” to assist out the campuses that were historically underfunded.  However, the statistics below volition exhibit that the problems get got solely gotten worse for the underfunded campuses.

Looking at the most recent enrollment statistics, we tin multiply the expose of non-resident students past times $26,000 to encounter how much extra tuition each campus volition generate adjacent twelvemonth (each non-resident pupil pays an additional $23,000, in addition to they create non have tuition discounts, which average 30% for in-state students).  For each campus, I get got listed the expose of non-resident students, the additional tuition dollars non-resident students generate, the total of funds each campus volition teach this twelvemonth through rebenching, the combination of additional non-resident tuition dollars in addition to rebenching funds, in addition to the total the position down auditor said each campus was overfunded or underfunded inward 2009-10 earlier the modify to the novel arrangement (Merced in addition to UCSF are excluded for historical reasons):

Click icon to enlarge

In virtually cases, the novel arrangement is making things much worse for the campuses that get got been historically underfunded.   In fact, the auditor solely looked at i twelvemonth of imbalances, in addition to if she had taken into concern human relationship all of the position down funds, the imbalance would get got been much worse. 

One means of interpreting this information is combine all of the numbers to teach a full general feel of the funding distribution earlier in addition to afterwards the non-resident tuition golden rush.  For example, inward 2009-10, if each campus received the same position down in addition to tuition dollars per student, UCSB would get got received an additional $94 i M one thousand dollars in addition to UCLA would get got gotten $99 i M one thousand less.  To assist rectify this situation, the rebenching gives UCSB some $9 i M one thousand inward 2014-15 , in addition to UCLA does non teach whatever additional funding, exactly UCLA remains $184 i M one thousand ahead, in addition to this figure takes into concern human relationship enrollment differences.  If nosotros in addition to then add together non-resident tuition to the mix, UCSB remains $210 i M one thousand behind UCLA, in addition to this is afterwards years of imbalances.

It should last clear that the UC arrangement needs to rethink its enrollment in addition to funding model.  As the position down auditor argued, the campuses that get got been historically underfunded are the same campuses alongside the highest degree of under-represented minority students.  The consequence is that equally these students pay to a greater extent than for their education, they are beingness systematically underfunded.  UC should motion to a transparent revenue sharing model for non-resident tuition. 

Share this post