Uc Offers Novel Pension Invention To Re-Distribute Wealth To The Top
Thursday, July 21, 2022
Edit
Many pages into the UC Post-Retirement Benefits Task Force Report, i discovers that non exclusively volition the novel proposed innovation cut down the retirement benefits of many novel hires yesteryear 50%, but the academy also intends to growth the retirement payouts to the highest earners inward the system. For example, nether proposed innovation A, people making $67,000 would meet their average retirement payout teach from $9,750 to $4,980, as well as their retiree healthcare practise goodness would live reduced from $6,135 to $3,313. Meanwhile, a senior managing director making $250,000 inward innovation A, would human face upwardly a retirement reduction from $66,000 to $50,000. While it may seem unfair that a soul making a lower salary loses 50% of his or her retirement, but the soul making $250,000 is exclusively reduced 25%, nosotros are told non to worry because social safety volition brand upwardly the divergence for the soul alongside a lower salary.
The key declaration set frontward yesteryear the steering commission of the Task Force is that since low-wage workers brand virtually of their retirement income through social security, they tin laissez passer on notice hold upwardly on a to a greater extent than reduced pension. However, the dissenting thought yesteryear faculty as well as staff reveals the inequality built into this proposed system: “The Task Force study presents a graph showing the income replacement provided at diverse income levels yesteryear electrical flow UCRP, Option A, as well as Option B for employees retiring at historic flow 65. This graph obscures the fact that Options Influenza A virus subtype H5N1 as well as B both stand upwardly for a drastic reduction inward pension benefits for those who retire inward their belatedly 50s, the average retirement historic flow of UC staff. Option Influenza A virus subtype H5N1 would cut down the UCRP practise goodness of an employee retiring at historic flow sixty alongside a salary of $55,000 yesteryear 56.8%, piece Option B would cut down it yesteryear 42.4%.” If nosotros element inward the electrical flow average historic flow of retirement for detail groups of employment, nosotros notice that the people making the lowest salaries volition receive got their pensions reduced the most.
While electrical flow employees may experience that they receive got escaped this novel system, it is of import to Federal Reserve annotation that all employees volition live allowed to opt into the novel tier, as well as the academy volition stimulate people to purchase into a reduced practise goodness yesteryear raising the employee contribution flat higher than the flat for the novel plan. At our terminal benefits briefing, nosotros were told that inward 2013, the employee contribution may teach to 7% or fifty-fifty higher. According to the dissenting thought of the faculty as well as staff, this type of forced selection may live illegal: “Historically, employee contributions to UCRP for employees enrolled inward Social Security receive got never exceeded 3%; raising contributions higher upwardly 7% fundamentally alters the terms of UCRP as well as has the outcome of coercing electrical flow employees to “choose” the novel plan. This coerced “choice” raises questions.”
The dissenting thought non exclusively objects to the novel proposed plans on the grounds that they volition practise a bang-up inequality inward the system, but it is also clear that the proposed novel tier volition practise naught to convey downwardly the costs of the organisation for the side yesteryear side x years: “The employer normal terms of Option B, 9%, is higher than the 7.3% employer normal terms of Option A. However, every bit the Executive Summary itself documents, Options Influenza A virus subtype H5N1 as well as B outcome inward the same terms to the operating budget for the years 2011-2021.” Since the proposed organisation is unjust as well as volition non cut down the operating budget inward the side yesteryear side x years, it is unclear why the steering commission of the chore strength decided to recommend alternative Influenza A virus subtype H5N1 as well as B.
What is clear, however, is that the chore strength is controlled yesteryear people who are dedicated to increasing compensation at the top. As the dissenting thought argues, “In recommendations #10 as well as #11, the Steering Committee proposes “restoring” benefits to those whose salary exceeds the IRS covered compensation cap. The Academic Senate is on tape every bit opposing Recommendation #10 (Letter from Senate Chair Croughan to President Yudof, 03/08/09). Recommendation #11 appears to live a machinery to extend retirement benefits (admittedly non drawn from the UCRP trust fund) to these highly compensated individuals inward ways that are less visible to the public. While nosotros advocate competitive full remuneration for all UC employee groups, it is unseemly to render a large “restoration” of pension benefits to highly compensated employees at the same fourth dimension that pension benefits of other groups are beingness curtailed; the outcome on faculty as well as staff morale as well as on the University’s populace relations would live highly detrimental.” It is foreign that the UC uses social safety income every bit a justification for cutting the benefits of low-wage workers, but supplemental retirement packages for the highest compensated people are justified on the grounds of the demand to retain “talent.”
Of degree i of the bang-up talents of the senior management grouping is their might to growth their ain incomes, piece they claim that everyone else must sacrifice. The dissenting thought brings this message dwelling household yesteryear showing how the proposed practise goodness cuts stand upwardly for a sustained reduction inward compensation for virtually employees: “It should non live overlooked that the University’s credibility alongside electrical flow employees volition live severely damaged, as well as it volition live understood that furloughs are to live replaced alongside permanent cuts inward full remuneration---furloughs yesteryear around other name.” As I receive got argued, the retirement liabilities are beingness used to scare employees into accepting reduced pay as well as benefits; let’s all bring together together to teach by this pernicious move.
The key declaration set frontward yesteryear the steering commission of the Task Force is that since low-wage workers brand virtually of their retirement income through social security, they tin laissez passer on notice hold upwardly on a to a greater extent than reduced pension. However, the dissenting thought yesteryear faculty as well as staff reveals the inequality built into this proposed system: “The Task Force study presents a graph showing the income replacement provided at diverse income levels yesteryear electrical flow UCRP, Option A, as well as Option B for employees retiring at historic flow 65. This graph obscures the fact that Options Influenza A virus subtype H5N1 as well as B both stand upwardly for a drastic reduction inward pension benefits for those who retire inward their belatedly 50s, the average retirement historic flow of UC staff. Option Influenza A virus subtype H5N1 would cut down the UCRP practise goodness of an employee retiring at historic flow sixty alongside a salary of $55,000 yesteryear 56.8%, piece Option B would cut down it yesteryear 42.4%.” If nosotros element inward the electrical flow average historic flow of retirement for detail groups of employment, nosotros notice that the people making the lowest salaries volition receive got their pensions reduced the most.
While electrical flow employees may experience that they receive got escaped this novel system, it is of import to Federal Reserve annotation that all employees volition live allowed to opt into the novel tier, as well as the academy volition stimulate people to purchase into a reduced practise goodness yesteryear raising the employee contribution flat higher than the flat for the novel plan. At our terminal benefits briefing, nosotros were told that inward 2013, the employee contribution may teach to 7% or fifty-fifty higher. According to the dissenting thought of the faculty as well as staff, this type of forced selection may live illegal: “Historically, employee contributions to UCRP for employees enrolled inward Social Security receive got never exceeded 3%; raising contributions higher upwardly 7% fundamentally alters the terms of UCRP as well as has the outcome of coercing electrical flow employees to “choose” the novel plan. This coerced “choice” raises questions.”
The dissenting thought non exclusively objects to the novel proposed plans on the grounds that they volition practise a bang-up inequality inward the system, but it is also clear that the proposed novel tier volition practise naught to convey downwardly the costs of the organisation for the side yesteryear side x years: “The employer normal terms of Option B, 9%, is higher than the 7.3% employer normal terms of Option A. However, every bit the Executive Summary itself documents, Options Influenza A virus subtype H5N1 as well as B outcome inward the same terms to the operating budget for the years 2011-2021.” Since the proposed organisation is unjust as well as volition non cut down the operating budget inward the side yesteryear side x years, it is unclear why the steering commission of the chore strength decided to recommend alternative Influenza A virus subtype H5N1 as well as B.
What is clear, however, is that the chore strength is controlled yesteryear people who are dedicated to increasing compensation at the top. As the dissenting thought argues, “In recommendations #10 as well as #11, the Steering Committee proposes “restoring” benefits to those whose salary exceeds the IRS covered compensation cap. The Academic Senate is on tape every bit opposing Recommendation #10 (Letter from Senate Chair Croughan to President Yudof, 03/08/09). Recommendation #11 appears to live a machinery to extend retirement benefits (admittedly non drawn from the UCRP trust fund) to these highly compensated individuals inward ways that are less visible to the public. While nosotros advocate competitive full remuneration for all UC employee groups, it is unseemly to render a large “restoration” of pension benefits to highly compensated employees at the same fourth dimension that pension benefits of other groups are beingness curtailed; the outcome on faculty as well as staff morale as well as on the University’s populace relations would live highly detrimental.” It is foreign that the UC uses social safety income every bit a justification for cutting the benefits of low-wage workers, but supplemental retirement packages for the highest compensated people are justified on the grounds of the demand to retain “talent.”
Of degree i of the bang-up talents of the senior management grouping is their might to growth their ain incomes, piece they claim that everyone else must sacrifice. The dissenting thought brings this message dwelling household yesteryear showing how the proposed practise goodness cuts stand upwardly for a sustained reduction inward compensation for virtually employees: “It should non live overlooked that the University’s credibility alongside electrical flow employees volition live severely damaged, as well as it volition live understood that furloughs are to live replaced alongside permanent cuts inward full remuneration---furloughs yesteryear around other name.” As I receive got argued, the retirement liabilities are beingness used to scare employees into accepting reduced pay as well as benefits; let’s all bring together together to teach by this pernicious move.