Warning: Tricky Accounting Is Threatening Our Benefits
Wednesday, October 4, 2023
Edit
The UC organization has embarked inwards the procedure of downsizing retiree benefits, as well as it looks similar their manipulative crusade is working. Last week, The Council of UC Faculty Associations made the next statement: "UCRP is badly underfunded inwards price of its liability for futurity benefits that employees began accruing later June 30, 2008. Moreover, the unfunded futurity liabilities are increasing really rapidly. In 2009, UCOP as well as TFIR estimated that if contributions were non at nowadays restarted, the per centum of funded liabilities would autumn to 61% as well as the dollar amount of the unfunded liability would increment to $18 billion past times 2013 – iii years from now!" This focus on unfunded liability for the pension conception is inwards business office a scare tactic to forcefulness the older faculty to force for higher employee contributions as well as may assistance the management gut the conception for novel hires.
Like the Commission on the Future of the University, the faculty association is buying all of the administration’s questionable accounting moves. First of all, every bit I discussed inwards relation to the Executive Summary of the Commission’s initial recommendations, due to an accounting alter from 2006, the UC has been forced to declare every bit a liability on its books all of the futurity costs for pension as well as retiree healthcare. This way that piece the UC is nevertheless funding the healthcare for retirees on a “pay every bit you lot go” basis, they are declaring a multi-billion dollar liability. Thus in conclusion year, every bit they spent $279 1000000 on healthcare for retirees, they declared a $1.5 billion liability, which helped them to claim a budget deficit every bit they moved funds from unrestricted to restricted accounts. Once again, it is of import to stress, the UC did non genuinely pass $1.5 billion, it entirely moved the coin on its books. The UC currently has over $6 billion of retiree healthcare liability on its book, which way that the academy looks a lot poorer than it genuinely is.
The council’s claim that the UC faces an $18 billion liability echoes the Commission’s claim that an $18 billion liability volition threaten the basic mission of the university: “The funding gap is exacerbated past times a pregnant unfunded post-retirement create goodness liability, which is currently $1.9 billion as well as expected to accomplish $18 billion past times 2013. Similarly, the University’s unfunded post-retirement healthcare liability is projected to grow from $13 billion today to $18 billion past times 2013 . . . Because the PEB Task Force is scheduled to finalize recommendations past times this summer, nosotros create non address PEB issues inwards this report, but recognize that to a greater extent than than whatever fiscal challenge facing the University, the toll of providing these benefits has the potential to overwhelm our might to proceed our tripartite mission of teaching, research, as well as world service.” In other words, the crisis inwards the academy is existence driven past times the university’s commitment to pension as well as retiree healthcare.
Moreover, the Council has every bit good accepted the administration’s declaration that the underfunding of the pension conception has naught to create amongst the bad direction of the UC’s investments: “Although the 2007-09 stock marketplace set crash was responsible for simply about of this unfunded liability, most of it results from the fact that no employee or employer contributions receive got been made for nearly xx years. While the recent rising inwards the fiscal markets has eased the problem, the gap is nevertheless enormous.” The truth is that the UC’s pension investment tape went from existence 1 of the best to existence 1 of the worst later the direction of the funds was outsourced inwards 2000. Moreover, inwards the optic of the global fiscal meltdown, UC increased its holdings inwards existent estate as well as mortgage-backed securities, as well as these moves may receive got been motivated past times several regents who receive got strong investments inwards existent estate as well as securities. It is irresponsible for the council to non telephone band for straight employee oversight over the UC’s pension investments.
Since our academy is total of famous economists as well as accountants, it should hold upwardly possible for somebody to challenge the university’s accounting mechanisms. If nosotros create non query their assumptions, nosotros volition all encounter our benefits as well as compensation learn down, every bit the centre mission is threatened. While it is necessary to protect our pension conception as well as healthcare for retirees, nosotros demand to know the truth nigh the UC’s finances.
Like the Commission on the Future of the University, the faculty association is buying all of the administration’s questionable accounting moves. First of all, every bit I discussed inwards relation to the Executive Summary of the Commission’s initial recommendations, due to an accounting alter from 2006, the UC has been forced to declare every bit a liability on its books all of the futurity costs for pension as well as retiree healthcare. This way that piece the UC is nevertheless funding the healthcare for retirees on a “pay every bit you lot go” basis, they are declaring a multi-billion dollar liability. Thus in conclusion year, every bit they spent $279 1000000 on healthcare for retirees, they declared a $1.5 billion liability, which helped them to claim a budget deficit every bit they moved funds from unrestricted to restricted accounts. Once again, it is of import to stress, the UC did non genuinely pass $1.5 billion, it entirely moved the coin on its books. The UC currently has over $6 billion of retiree healthcare liability on its book, which way that the academy looks a lot poorer than it genuinely is.
The council’s claim that the UC faces an $18 billion liability echoes the Commission’s claim that an $18 billion liability volition threaten the basic mission of the university: “The funding gap is exacerbated past times a pregnant unfunded post-retirement create goodness liability, which is currently $1.9 billion as well as expected to accomplish $18 billion past times 2013. Similarly, the University’s unfunded post-retirement healthcare liability is projected to grow from $13 billion today to $18 billion past times 2013 . . . Because the PEB Task Force is scheduled to finalize recommendations past times this summer, nosotros create non address PEB issues inwards this report, but recognize that to a greater extent than than whatever fiscal challenge facing the University, the toll of providing these benefits has the potential to overwhelm our might to proceed our tripartite mission of teaching, research, as well as world service.” In other words, the crisis inwards the academy is existence driven past times the university’s commitment to pension as well as retiree healthcare.
Moreover, the Council has every bit good accepted the administration’s declaration that the underfunding of the pension conception has naught to create amongst the bad direction of the UC’s investments: “Although the 2007-09 stock marketplace set crash was responsible for simply about of this unfunded liability, most of it results from the fact that no employee or employer contributions receive got been made for nearly xx years. While the recent rising inwards the fiscal markets has eased the problem, the gap is nevertheless enormous.” The truth is that the UC’s pension investment tape went from existence 1 of the best to existence 1 of the worst later the direction of the funds was outsourced inwards 2000. Moreover, inwards the optic of the global fiscal meltdown, UC increased its holdings inwards existent estate as well as mortgage-backed securities, as well as these moves may receive got been motivated past times several regents who receive got strong investments inwards existent estate as well as securities. It is irresponsible for the council to non telephone band for straight employee oversight over the UC’s pension investments.
Since our academy is total of famous economists as well as accountants, it should hold upwardly possible for somebody to challenge the university’s accounting mechanisms. If nosotros create non query their assumptions, nosotros volition all encounter our benefits as well as compensation learn down, every bit the centre mission is threatened. While it is necessary to protect our pension conception as well as healthcare for retirees, nosotros demand to know the truth nigh the UC’s finances.